NEW PAPER FROM MICHAEL HUDSON EXPLAINS HOW BANKS HAVE GIVEN UP THEIR USEFUL ROLE SUPPORTING ENTERPRISE, AND OPTED FOR RENTIER PROFITS ON MORTGAGES
NO WONDER HOUSE PRICES ARE ROCKETING UP!
absentee owners extracting rent, but by
owner-occupants. As home ownership spread, new buyers
came to support the rentier drives to
block land taxation—not realizing that rent that was not
taxed would be paid to the banks as
interest to absorb the rent-of-location hitherto paid to absentee
landlords.
Real estate has risen in price as a
result of debt leveraging. The process makes investors,
speculators, and their bankers wealthy
but raises the cost of housing (and commercial property)
for new buyers, who are obliged to take
on more debt in order to obtain secure housing. That cost
is also passed on to renters, and
employers ultimately are obliged to pay their labor force enough
to pay these financialized housing
costs.
From North America to Europe, debt
deflation has become the distinguishing feature of
today’s economies, imposing austerity
as debt service absorbs a rising share of personal and
corporate income and thereby leaves
less to spend on goods and services. The economy’s indebted
90 percent find themselves obliged to
pay more and more interest and financial fees. The corporate
sector, and now also the state and
local government sector, likewise are obliged to pay a
rising share of their
revenue to creditors.
Investors are willing to pay most of
their rental income as interest to the banking sector
because they hope to sell their
property at some point for a capital gain. Modern finance capitalism
focuses on total
returns, defined as current income plus
asset-price
gains, above all for land
and real estate (figure 1). Inasmuch as
a home or other property is worth however much banks
will lend against it, wealth is created
primarily by financial means by banks lending a rising proportion
of the value of assets pledged as
collateral.
The fact that asset-price gains are
largely debt-financed explains why economic growth is
slowing in the United States and
Europe, even as stock market and real estate prices are inflated
on credit. The result is a
debt-leveraged economy.
Changes in the value of the economy’s
land from year to year far exceeds the change in GDP.
Wealth is obtained primarily by
asset-price (capital) gains in the valuation of land and real estate,
stocks, bonds, and creditor loans (virtual
wealth), not so much by saving income (wages, profits,
and rents). The magnitude of these
asset-price gains tends to dwarf profits, rental income, and
wages. The tendency has been to imagine that rising prices for real estate, stocks, and bonds has been
making homeowners richer. But this
price rise is fueled by bank credit. A home or other property
is worth however much a bank will lend
against it—and banks have lent a larger and larger proportion
of the home’s value since 1945. For US real estate as a whole, debt has come to exceed equity for more than a decade now. Rising real estate prices have made banks and speculators rich, but have left homeowners and commercial real estate debt strapped.
The economy as a whole has suffered.
Debt-fueled housing costs in the United States are so
high that if all Americans were given
their physical consumer goods for free—their food, clothing
and so forth—they still could not
compete with workers in China or most other countries.
That factor is a major reason why the
US economy is deindustrializing. Thus, this policy of creating
wealth by
financialization undercuts the logic of industrial capitalism.
Can be found at https://thesaker.is/finance-capitalism-versus-industrial-capitalism-the-rentier-resurgence-and-takeover/
No comments:
Post a Comment